AuthorWritten by Rainer Lang, CIO & Founder at RML Advisory Archives
September 2024
Categories |
Back to Blog
The Appeal of Infrastructure.9/19/2024 Infrastructure plays a vital role in supporting the economy and societal progress. It can produce consistent and reliable cash flows with attractive returns that can safeguard against inflation and provide stability in different economic conditions. Investments in infrastructure typically exhibit low volatility and are not strongly correlated with other types of assets, making them a valuable addition to an institutional investor's portfolio. In this article, RML Advisory covers several topics such as the appeal of infrastructure, rethinking manager selection, and as a conclusion why smaller funds are crucial for portfolio diversification. Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document.
0 Comments
Read More
Back to Blog
Why sustainable infrastructure matters.6/11/2024 G20 countries are increasingly recognizing the significance of sustainable infrastructure in driving economic growth, job creation, and competitiveness.
Investments in infrastructure projects like railways, roads, water treatment plants and next gen infrastructure projects not only create immediate employment opportunities but also lead to long-term productivity gains. Studies from OECD and IMF reveal a 1.6 multiplier effect on short-term employment and overall economic productivity. Infrastructure also plays a central role in meeting other development objectives, and this includes the green agenda. Given the long lifecycle of infrastructure assets, policy and investment decisions in sustainable infrastructure today will have lasting implications for climate and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) broadly. Explore our investment opportunities in this sector for a sustainable future.
Back to Blog
Asset Class Infrastructure Equity2/7/2024 SummaryInvestments in infrastructure equity are attractive to investors for various reasons. On the one hand, the need for investment worldwide is enormous. According to a study by McKinsey, almost three trillion Euros will have to be spent on infrastructure worldwide every year until 2030 to keep pace with expected economic growth. Furthermore, infrastructure investments offer attractive risk-adjusted and inflation-protected returns with stable, ongoing income from long-lived tangible assets. Finally, they have a low correlation to other asset classes (equities, bonds, real estate, etc.) and the economic cycle and comparatively low cash flow volatility. Predictability and diversification effects are therefore strong arguments in favor of infrastructure as an asset class for investors. Especially in a low-interest rate environment, infrastructure investments offer an attractive alternative to government bonds, for example. Investing in private infrastructure offers a compelling long-term value proposition. Compared to public markets, accurately timing investments may result in limited upside potential, while the consequences of mistiming can also be mitigated. Due to their characteristics, infrastructure equity investments are ideal for pension funds and insurance companies. Infrastructure Investment TopicsDeglobalization: Deglobalization is no longer viewed negatively in the business community. The shift towards onshoring manufacturing capacity and prioritizing energy security necessitates significant investments. Interestingly, this trend is also leading to the development of new facilities in rural areas that were previously overlooked. As a result, infrastructure investors now have access to untapped markets. Embracing deglobalization can bring about new opportunities for growth and development. Source: World Trade Organization, October 2023. Digitalization: The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the significance of digital infrastructure, particularly with the increased adoption of remote work and education. The popularity of high-definition video conferencing has made high-speed internet a necessity. However, deal volumes for digital infrastructure investments have declined since reaching a peak of almost USD 200 billion in 2022. Investors have become cautious due to overly optimistic growth assumptions and debt-fueled investments. Nonetheless, the hype surrounding ChatGPT and generative AI has brought renewed energy to the sector, as evidenced by the increased stock prices of data center companies like Digital Realty and Equinix. Given past disappointments of similar trends, investors need to approach this opportunity with a balanced perspective. Nevertheless, supported by reputable hyperscale companies, AI may drive significant investment in AI-related infrastructure. Source: UBS Decarbonization: Clean energy remains a popular investment choice for infrastructure funds, driven by technological advancements, political backing, and stable economics. While some negative headlines have been regarding pushback against green energy, most renewable investors and developers remain confident in the industry's future. However, skeptics are raising concerns about potential risks from this opposition. With essential elections approaching in the US and Europe, policy changes could possibly impact the renewable energy sector. Despite these uncertainties, the International Energy Agency forecasts significant global green energy investments of USD 1.7 trillion in 2024 and beyond, demonstrating continued growth and potential opportunities. Source: UBS Why investors should consider smaller infrastructure funds with a mid-market focus rather than larger fundsRisk profiles are complex, especially for larger projects with multiple potential points of failure. The mid-size infrastructure market tends to be underserved and, therefore, allows for attractive returns with well-mitigated downside risk. Larger funds with over 1.5bn euros face challenges in deploying their capital. Limited availability of deals compared to global capital deployment puts pressure on these entities to invest within their investment horizon. This may result in increased prices and higher risk tolerance. Significant funds may adopt different strategies in the competitive landscape of larger infrastructure transactions. However, smaller funds in the mid-market benefit from deal scarcity and abundant capital, allowing them to invest flexibly and reject unfavorable transactions. We like managers that tailor the risk profile to align with their goals rather than relying solely on due diligence. In addition, where these smaller funds have a powerful proprietary deal sourcing network, it brings the advantage of working on transactions before they hit the market, giving them a head start and less competition on price. Well-established funds have the expertise to develop projects from construction to operations, creating a value inflection point. When investing in such "smaller funds", there is potential for lower risk and better returns due to the time and effort put into developing the opportunity and structuring the deal. This involves creating contracts and collaborating with stakeholders. The manager's active involvement and experience greatly benefit the contract terms with developers. Their hands-on approach and ability to develop trusted partnerships add value to the developers/vendors, leading to better opportunities for growth. ConclusionsSmaller funds with a mid-market focus offer a practical investment strategy. These funds focus on mid-market companies with strong growth potential and less competition than larger companies. By investing in these funds, investors can benefit from the upside of mid-market companies while mitigating risks associated with larger, established companies.
RML Advisory currently offers qualified investors access to two exciting infrastructure equity investment opportunities. For more information, please reach out to us.
Back to Blog
Infrastructure - Why Invest Now12/14/2023 1. Executive SummaryPrivate infrastructure faced challenges in 2023, with fundraising hitting a 10-year low and deal volumes dropping by 40% due to bid-ask spreads. The industry is grappling with high interest rates, a mixed economic outlook, and geopolitical tensions. Despite these obstacles, performance has remained relatively stable. As we approach the end of 2023, there is growing concern about the validity of the bearish market sentiment. Many skeptics are questioning the current valuations and performance of infrastructure, suggesting that it may be wise to remain on the sidelines until a correction takes place. Specific concerns have been raised about the feasibility of onshoring in light of increasing global trade volumes. These doubts accompany the skepticism surrounding the hype of artificial intelligence in digitalization, while worries persist about the resistance against clean energy in decarbonization efforts. Private infrastructure deal volumes have seen a decline worldwide in 2023 as caution prevails among buyers and sellers. Despite the industry having over USD 300 billion of dry powder, buyers are on the lookout for attractive deals while sellers are reluctant to offer significant discounts, resulting in a wide bid-ask spread. Source: Preqin, November 2023. 2. Macro OutlookThe infrastructure sector is experiencing significant growth due to key factors such as decarbonization, digitalization, deglobalization, and demographic change. Despite the recent challenges of inflation and interest rate shocks, market expectations are anticipated to reset in the coming years. This provides a cautiously optimistic outlook for increased deal activity, especially considering the long-term investment themes that remain intact. Source: Preqin, November 2023. 3. ValuationsCritics have raised concerns about the current interest rate pressures impacting infrastructure discount rates, suggesting that valuations should decrease. However, recent performance in this asset class has remained positive, with no widespread write-downs observed. When speaking to Investors we hear that they often focus on the significant increase in short-term yields, such as the 500bps rise in 12-month US treasury yields. However, when it comes to infrastructure assets, which are long-term investments with stable cash flows and useful lives of 20 years or more, it is more relevant to consider longer-term rates as an indication of the cost of capital. Interestingly, these longer-term rates have not experienced the same dramatic increase as short-term rates. Source: MSCI, November 2023; RML Advisory 4. Market TimingInvestors seem to be cautious about private infrastructure valuations and are waiting for a better entry point. They see the potential for profit by timing their investments correctly, as demonstrated by the drawdown and rebound in listed equities. However, it's important to note that private infrastructure offers unique advantages, such as low volatility and low correlations with other asset classes. Recent data shows that private infrastructure has not experienced major drawdowns, unlike public equities. Investing in private infrastructure offers a compelling long-term value proposition. Compared to public markets, accurately timing investments may result in limited upside potential, while the consequences of mistiming can also be mitigated. Source: MSCI, Bloomberg. 5. DeglobalizationDeglobalization is no longer viewed negatively in the business community. The shift towards onshoring manufacturing capacity and prioritizing energy security necessitates significant investments. Interestingly, this trend is also leading to the development of new facilities in rural areas that were previously overlooked. As a result, infrastructure investors now have access to untapped markets. Embracing deglobalization can bring about new opportunities for growth and development. Source: World Trade Organization, October 2023. 6. DigitalizationThe COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the significance of digital infrastructure, particularly with the increased adoption of remote work and education. The popularity of high-definition video conferencing has made high-speed internet a necessity. However, deal volumes for digital infrastructure investments have seen a decline since reaching a peak of almost USD 200 billion in 2022. Investors have become cautious due to over optimistic growth assumptions and debt-fueled investments. Nonetheless, the hype surrounding ChatGPT and generative AI has brought renewed energy to the sector, as evidenced by the increased stock prices of data center companies like Digital Realty and Equinix. It is important for investors to approach this opportunity with a balanced perspective, given the past disappointments of similar trends. Nevertheless, AI, supported by reputable hyperscale companies, may drive significant investment in AI-related infrastructure. Source: UBS 7. DecarbonizationClean energy continues to be a popular investment choice for infrastructure funds, driven by advancements in technology, political backing, and stable economics. While there have been some negative headlines regarding pushback against green energy, most renewable investors and developers remain confident in the industry's future. However, skeptics are raising concerns about potential risks from this opposition. With important elections approaching in the US and Europe, there is a possibility of policy changes that could impact the renewable energy sector. Despite these uncertainties, the International Energy Agency forecasts significant global green energy investments of USD 1.7 trillion in 2023 and beyond, demonstrating continued growth and potential opportunities. Source: UBS 8. A sensible investment strategyHere is why investors should consider smaller infrastructure funds with a mid-market focus rather than larger funds. Risk profiles are complex, especially for larger projects with multiple potential points of failure. The mid-size infrastructure market tends to be underserved and, therefore, allows for attractive returns with well-mitigated downside risk. Larger funds with over 1.5bn euros face challenges in deploying their capital. Limited availability of deals compared to global capital deployment puts pressure on these entities to invest within their investment horizon. This may result in increased prices and higher risk tolerance. In the competitive landscape of larger infrastructure transactions, significant funds may adopt different strategies. However, smaller funds in the mid-market benefit from deal scarcity and abundant capital, allowing them to invest flexibly and reject unfavourable transactions. We like managers that tailor the risk profile to align with their goals rather than relying solely on due diligence. In addition, where these smaller funds have a very strong proprietary deal sourcing network it brings the advantage of working on transactions before they hit the market, giving them a head start and less competition on price. Well-established funds have the expertise to develop projects from construction to operations, creating a value inflection point. When investing in such smaller funds, there is potential for lower risk and better returns due to the time and effort put into developing the opportunity and structuring the deal. This involves creating contracts and collaborating with stakeholders. The manager's active involvement and experience greatly benefit the contract terms with developers. Their hands-on approach and ability to develop trusted partnerships add value to the developers/vendors, leading to better opportunities for growth. 9. ConclusionsSmaller funds with a mid-market focus offer a practical investment strategy. These funds focus on mid-market companies with strong growth potential and less competition compared to larger companies. By investing in these funds, investors can benefit from the upside of mid-market companies while mitigating risks associated with larger, established companies.
Back to Blog
Why Invest in Infrastructure?12/6/2023 1. Introduction
Unlisted infrastructure continues to gain recognition as a distinctive asset class and holds considerable appeal for investors, including pension funds and life assurance companies focused on yield and seeking to match their long-term liabilities. Globally, demand for private infrastructure capital continues to grow, driven by governmental budget constraints, the need for investment to facilitate continued economic growth, and a secondary market for existing assets, which continues to increase in importance. As regulatory changes may cause banks to retrench, investors have also begun looking increasingly at the provision of private infrastructure debt. Investing in unlisted infrastructure offers attractive benefits, including the possibility to own and actively manage real assets with a diversified end-user base and high barriers to entry, as well as performance characteristics that are potentially resilient to the economic cycle. Infrastructure offers relatively low long-term cash flow volatility compared with other asset classes and can also provide attractive, inflation-hedged total returns.* *No assurance can be made that an investment in infrastructure will achieve its stated objectives. Investing in infrastructure however is not risk free; it requires strategic asset allocation decisions, a detailed understanding of jurisdictions and regulation, as well as specific asset management skills to mitigate risks and support investment returns. Unlisted infrastructure investment has the potential to offer diversification benefits for multi-asset investors due to the lower correlation of performance with other major asset classes. It is also capable of delivering attractive risk-adjusted returns, due to relatively lower volatility and strong returns, particularly in the medium and long term. Mature infrastructure provides stable, long-term, income-oriented returns, while growth and development infrastructure offer material capital appreciation potential. Returns across all lifecycles can potentially be enhanced with active asset management by an experienced infrastructure manager. 2. Infrastructure as an Asset Class - Key asset class benefits A real asset class: Infrastructure represents a tangible asset – i.e. a combination of land and structures that constitutes real property – but is not necessarily a commodity in the same sense as real estate. Real property will almost always retain a residual value, which is particularly attractive during periods of distress. Essential services resilient to the economic cycle: User demand patterns for infrastructure assets tend to be relatively inelastic given the essential nature of these services. Therefore, they tend to exhibit a lower correlation to the economic cycle compared with other sectors. In addition, some assets, such as electricity and gas distribution networks, can be regulated, which can lead to an increase in return predictability. Depending on the regulation, assets can be volume neutral, offering returns that are independent of volumes and demand fluctuations. The economic cycle can have more impact on unregulated services, such as airports and seaports, though the essential nature of such services mitigates this risk. As a general rule, when looking at different infrastructure asset types, it could be stated that the stronger and more predictable the regulation and contractual framework is for a certain asset, the lower its sensitivity to the economic context and the more stable its cash flows over the long term. During economic and market volatility, this defensive characteristic has been an attractive feature of the asset class. Diversified end-user base: The counterparties to infrastructure assets are generally a widely diversified group of end users, which helps to stabilise cash flows. Often the customer base includes governments and local authorities, which tend to be more creditworthy than most private counterparties. High barriers to entry: Infrastructure requires a high level of initial capital investment and this acts as a significant impediment to potential competitors entering the market. Assets can enjoy monopolistic or quasi-monopolistic market positioning and it would be economically unsound, or legally not possible, to build a competing facility. Examples of natural monopolies include water infrastructure, as well as gas and electricity grids, which is why such assets are almost always regulated. Long-term cash flow predictability: Regulation provides long-term revenue visibility to infrastructure investments. Additionally, ownership of regulated infrastructure is usually transferred to private investors through long-term concession agreements that can range up to 99 years. Concession agreements give the right to operate a business for a given amount of time and under certain conditions. If the concession involves a monopolistic business, for example a gas distribution network, then the revenues will often be regulated in the long term. The long-term nature of concession agreements represents an advantage for asset managers and enables them to put in place long-term strategies to maximise asset values, including, for example, the optimization of operations capital expenditures and long-term financing. In the case of unregulated assets, the depreciable operating life of wellmaintained infrastructure assets tends to be long and predictable. Inflation hedge: Depending on the type of infrastructure asset, price inflation can sometimes be passed on to the end consumer. Most regulatory frameworks allow regulated assets to use inflation-indexed user tariffs, often associated with electricity transmission and distribution or gas distribution. However, inflation-indexed toll increases can be common features of concessions for some types of surface transport such as roads, bridges, and tunnels. For unregulated assets, full hedging may not always be possible. Active management opportunities: Infrastructure provides managers with an active and strategic opportunity to add value directly to an investment with the objective of increasing returns. This type of value enhancement is typically most feasible in the case of unlisted investments. Applied effectively, active asset management can, amongst other things, help boost user volumes and revenues, cut costs and optimize capital structures and cash flow, enhancing returns over and above the cost of active management. The ability to create value successfully will be dependent in part upon the specialist skills of the asset management team, but also, for example, upon the level of regulation of an asset, whereby higher regulatory protection might reduce the level of operational flexibility given to asset managers.
Back to Blog
Why smaller infrastructure fund sizes with mid-market focus versus large funds are appealing12/6/2023 When discussing infrastructure investment opportunities with potential investors, they often prefer large funds over mid-market transactions.
There is a lot to be said about this, which is why investors would do well to take a closer look at opportunities in the mid-market segment. 1. Expected Returns Expected returns are higher, as (i) the market for the (mid-market sized funds) is less crowded than the (large-sized) market the more considerable funds are targeting, (ii) Typically smaller infrastructure funds are in a position to work on transactions before they hit the market and therefore have a head start in the transaction and face less competition on price than with competitive auctions and (ii) well-established funds have the team, the experience and capabilities to develop projects from the start of construction throughout operations, thereby creating a value inflection point, rather than just buying operational assets. (The opportunity to create value is more significant). The higher returns are not generated from a higher risk profile but from the fact that the manager puts in a lot of hard effort and work. 2. Risk Risk is lower as dedicated smaller funds spend a significant amount of time (as opposed to money) in developing the opportunity and structuring the deal, including setting up the underlying contracts (construction, operations and maintenance, supply, off-take, etc.). The investment team often has lengthy discussions with various stakeholders (in both the private and public sectors) before an investment opportunity becomes concrete. The risk profile is, therefore, actively structured by the team to fit the fund, as opposed to a more standard approach where a fund performs due diligence on a given structure and risk profile to assess the opportunity. Also, risk profiles are not a linear equation. The larger projects become, the more complex they get, and more points of failure can arise. 3. Contract Terms The contract terms with the developers are better through the manager's active involvement, experience, and the fact that he develops trusted partnerships. In return, the hands-on approach also adds value for the developer/vendor in creating and growing the opportunity. Combined with the work the manager puts upfront in structuring the transaction and contracts, the terms are better, resulting in a lower risk profile for the same or better returns. 4. Capital Deployment Larger funds are under pressure to deploy capital. Due to the size of more significant funds ( > 1.5bn euro), they are pushed towards more effective transactions. The number of available deals for these more considerable funds is limited compared to the amount of capital deployed worldwide. Combined with time constraints in the investment horizon of these funds, it puts much pressure on them to deploy capital, thereby driving up prices and/or increasing risk tolerance and reducing return capabilities. We see this in the larger infrastructure transactions where significant funds compete against each other but sometimes even have different strategies. This is due to the scarcity of deals and the abundance of capital. Fortunately, the market that smaller funds serve (mid-market) and the fact that such funds have a significantly large pipeline compared to the expected fund size allows smaller managers to invest in the projects they believe are the right fit and reject transactions that they think are not favorable in terms of risk and/or return. *An Article 8 Fund under SFDR is defined as “a Fund which promotes, among other characteristics, environmental or social characteristics, or a combination of those characteristics, provided that the companies in which the investments are made follow good governance practices.” Don't hesitate to contact us for more information. |